No to Killing

No to Hunting! No to War!

A disclaimer. You may not like my point of view, but I need to share my belief that humans must stop killing.

IMG_20190907_161225

I am upset… Yes, I am really upset. I feel sick inside and tearful because I have just witnessed the unnecessary death of an endangered Turtle Dove… An animal that we associate with ‘love.’ There was nothing loving about its death. It was shot, tried to fly away, but could not land in its chosen refuge of a willow tree. Instead, the injured bird cascaded down through the willow branches to hit the river below. It did its best to pull itself to shore, slid under the overhanging foliage and disappeared, most likely to die an agonising death. I stood on the opposite bank separated by water from the hapless creature and separated from hunters by an impenetrable bank and fencing. I, the sole witness to a life lost for no reason, am inconsolable.

My grief means nothing to the sport hunter. They don’t care about the lives they take. They operate in disguise as farmers protecting their crops or livestock from what they consider ‘vermin.’ How strange then, that they bring in groups of enthusiasts to help them. No, their hunting is not a protection of the farm… It is a bloodlust, a degraded form of entertainment that generates huge profits for those who provide the ‘organised shoots.’ Whether the perpetrators are on horseback, in a 4×4, or on foot, they all have a ‘kill’ mentality as their main objective. It happens not just in the UK, but everywhere. Gutless individuals dress themselves in fatigues, arm themselves with expensive high powered rifles and shotguns and hunt down the mostly tame wildlife that looks on innocently as the gun is pointed at them.

This is not hunting for food. Millions of pheasants and partridges are imported each year into Britain for the sole purpose of killing them. They are not taken home, dressed and hung, so a hungry family might eat. Their bodies are mostly discarded right after the shoot.

Those that turn guns on animals, have no problem turning a gun on a person. Their bloodlust doesn’t stop but is only held in check by laws that would see a person go to prison for shooting another person. The law does not protect animals. They are victimised in such horrible ways and the perpetrators are not punished.

I reported my sighting to the RSPB and to Wild Justice. They can’t do anything, I have no evidence… No photo, no video of any of it, but making people aware is first and foremost, available to us. To be silent about witnessing a ‘wrong,’ is to condone such things. I cannot and will not condone hunting, whether it is a struggling fish on the end of a line, or a canned hunt of lions raised to be killed for a trophy rug. I do not condone farmed animals either. Yes, they are for food (for some but not for me). Farm animal existence is one that is equally persecuted and justified as necessarily cruel, whether in the living conditions or at the ultimate death in the abattoir. That is really shirking responsibility to provide a good life for an animal that dies for us to eat.

Likewise, warmongering amongst humans is just as cruel. It gives the bloodthirsty a reason to kill with impunity. Our world is, and always has been, full of people who force us into wars unwillingly, and kill us if we resist.

We must change our attitudes, and include compassion for the other living beings around us. If we do not, and continue our bloodlust, then humanity has no purpose and we will go extinct. There is no reason for us to be on a biodiverse earth if we choose only to kill the other life upon it including our own species. We have no purpose on Earth as a ‘killer.’

IMG_20190907_155656

33 thoughts on “No to Killing

  1. Excellent post, Collette! I think that hunting needs to be banned. The way we farm animals for food is no better in too many cases. Cruelty is cruelty – plain and simple.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. My guys are always sick when they find game that has been abused. They are careful about how they hunt and where and when. They are also thankful if they are successful and we consume and use almost every part of which is taken. Hunting and fishing are often done by incredibly stupid people and it angers me.
    I know this isn’t fully agreeing with your post, I am running parallel to it. I am in agreement with stupid people are not good. I do not consider my guys stupid or cruel. I hope my comments don’t blow up your feed with anger towards me. If so, you should delete my words. :o)

    Liked by 2 people

    1. While I have turned to a Vegan lifestyle, I can appreciate that not everyone will. I am glad that your sons are responsible with their hunts and make clean kills for your food table Kris. It is actually kinder than our abattoir processing methods, to kill animals outright for food. But when a kill is pointless, except for bloodlust, it makes me mighty mad! Thanks for sharing Kris.

      Liked by 2 people

  3. I totally agree with you, Colette. “Sport” hunting is one of the sickest “games” on the planet. It is a form of war that proceed from the bully approach: the bully, the killer, risks nothing, absolutely nothing. Her/his quest is for the lust of the kill, the brag of the kill, the spilling of blood for the fun of it. It is as indefensible as mass shootings against unarmed victims. I also fully agree with John Fioravanti. I say that raising animals for their meat, hide, leather, feathers or whatever else they may have of $$$ value is evil. We know we can eat fully and properly without killing any animals as there is an abundance of such proof, including myself but “man” has to kill (add to that rape and pillage) to feel that his existence means something. Since he cannot give life, he will take life, as if one is equivalent to the other. And before someone pipes in that I know nothing about it, I have done trapping, hunting, fishing and the “dressing” of meat. Sadly, never once did I NEED to engage in such behaviour – I just enjoyed doing it. Well, that was a long time ago but I can still see the eyes of my victims. I am thankful that I never entered the military to try out my killing skills against human beings although I know now that there is no difference: killing is killing. Shedding blood is shedding blood. Taking life is taking life. I also know that there is no “universal” law or non-law that permits such taking of life. For those who will not see and refuse to change, whether they believe it or not, there will be an accounting, both personal and collective. What goes round comes round and we do reap what we sow.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Yes, I too believe that what we sow, we reap, Sha’Tara. I have never hunted and even when I did eat meat, I didn’t particularly enjoy it that much. As a child, I used to push a lot of it around my plate. The more it looked like meat, fish, or animal parts, the less I wanted to eat it. I am aware though that people who have pet dogs, do need to feed them a proper diet. Dogs are carnivores. But our remit on this planet is to preserve life, not to kill it.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Sometimes a little humour thrown in… if you’ve ever watched the movie, “Shirley Valentine” you’ll probably remember that scene at the beginning that sets the whole thing up: she has to feed her neighbour’s vegan-fed bloodhound and gives him the steak she’d bought to make dinner for the narcissistic, misogynist husband…

        Liked by 1 person

  4. I would be interested to see these folk dressed out in loin clothes (not a pretty sight I grant you). given a pointed stick and told:
    ‘See that pride of lions/ pack of wolves/herd of large animals. Go out there and bring us back a kill’
    (My wife made me drop the rider…’Otherwise I’ll take pot shots at you with this hunting rifle’)

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Indeed Roger. Take away the gun and see them run!
      I actually don’t have a big problem with hunting for food. Recent research actually estimates that our prehistoric ancestors ate mostly roots, berries and grains. The kills were occasional when plant food was scarce and likely sprang from scavenged carcasses left by predators. Cooking developed so that the rotting meat could be eaten more safely. New thinking believes that is cooking (and preserving) that made brains bigger in homo sapiens. The calories were maximised as cooked food is easier for the body to process and use.
      But our present level of meat consumption (as a species) is unkind to the animals and must be revised.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. This is true Colette.
        A few years ago I listened to a UK radio programme, one in a series about life in the USA.
        One item related to a single Mom of two growing teenagers boys. Due to the lack of jobs and a stable welfare system in her state, she would a few dollars in ammunition and in the harsh winter go out hunting for a deer.
        With her sons aid haul the carcass back, skin and so forth and place the meat in the freezer in ensure sufficient food on the table for her two sons.
        All very basic.
        I could not in all faith condemn her. The state for not providing sufficient welfare or encouraging employers in the area yes.

        Liked by 3 people

        1. A thinking individual cannot argue against your statement, Roger. One could, of course, question the assumption that an Earthian ISSA has a greater built-in “right to life” than the deer (or other prey) but that would be for a different line of reasoning. Man chose, long ago, to become a predator and make himself the god (power of life and death is my measure of divinity) on planet Earth. As a consequence he lost his ability/will to interact properly and compassionately with all other life forms and eventually even with members of his own species. As a grossly devolved creature he now must subsist based on the rules he caused to emerge within his own mind and his society. He must exist without the ability to freely reason his legitimacy on his tortured world; without the means to even develop a purpose for being. Of necessity he must die off to become, in your oft used phrase, a blip or smear on the fossil record.

          Liked by 3 people

        2. I would go one step back in this particular case Sha’ Tara, and liken this woman to the vixen, lioness or similar hunting to feed her own. The right to life being something which applies to all creatures and as you say in another subject.
          This is why I chose this particular incident to demonstrate we have a base instinct to survive.
          Unfortunately due to our innate arrogance, ignorance and failure to grasp the Big Picture we have become this swarm upon the planet, and swarms do not, unlike many an SF plot prosper infinitely, they go so far, and then Nature kicks in and they die out.
          The Long thousands of millions of years’ records show no living thing is above removal.

          Liked by 1 person

        3. Survival instinct is one thing, lust to kill, that’s another. But when the numbers exceed the resources nature will not differentiate. Who even remembers the Club of Rome study that resulted in the book, Limits to Growth? A 40 year later review of the 70’s findings proves those were correct: man is nearing collapse due to rising scarcity and abuse of natural “resources.” Limits to Growth was my introduction to the environmental conscience. Mine grew, most were stillborn.

          Liked by 3 people

  5. Roger, I don’t really have a big problem with hunting for survival. I am sure I would eat whatever is available if I had no other choice. But we have to be careful that we don’t fall into the trap of thinking, “we’ll it is already dead,” when looking at the plastic wrapped meat cuts on the cooler shelves. It is not a good enough excuse when thinking about the welfare of the animals that provided those sanitised trays. The story of your woman who hunted for food after denied help, is perfectly understandable.
    All I ask is that people cut down on meat consumption, to take the strain off the need for despicable factory farms. If we do indeed go through Brexit, we can forego the need to import meat from the US and rely just on British meat. But even there, animal standards need to be raised. I have just read about yet the third abattoir (in Wrexham) that has been secretly filmed abusing the animals going in to be killed. It is shameful stuff, and even our mainstream media are beginning to call it out as cruel and unnecessary. A step in the right direction.

    As an aside to this… I notice that in the BBC radio 4 ‘Archers’ soap, the storyline plot has introduced a rewilding plan and it looks like it is withdrawing ‘Wil Grundy’ from his ‘gamekeeper’ role through a different developing plot line. The ‘Archers’ has traditionally followed real life farming developments within Britain, so this is hopeful stuff.
    There is also a second parliamentary hearing due (sometime between all the Boris and Jeremy fiasco), brought by Mark Avery for the second time, against Grouse shooting and its effect on the environment.
    The ‘Wild Justce’ organisation formed by Mark Avery, Chris Packham and Ruth Tinghay (all naturalists) has already challenged the law on the indiscriminate shooting of birds. Chris Packham awoke to dead crows tied to his garden gate after they successfully challenged the legality of that law. There is a change in attitude coming, and it is long overdue. Kindness will win out. We just have to keep speaking up for compassion within all of our society and never let the other side defeat us. 😊

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Sorry I missed this one completely (looking suspiciously at you Word Press Reader).
      I agree with you here; abattoir in Wrexham, my home town… It makes you wonder what affects working in such places has on people
      At least with most predators in the wild the actual kill is quick and efficient.
      We can achieve so much, must there be this brutality?

      Liked by 1 person

    1. It is always putting yourself in the place of those that face discrimination and hatred. Compassion is awareness of the wrongs, and the passion to try to put them right. The greatest leaders come with compassion in their hearts.

      Liked by 2 people

  6. You are right Colette and I abhor killing of any kind.. I can not even kill a spider, I rescue and take outdoors.. All things have the rights to life.. If a fly comes in the house, my husband laughs at me as I talk to it with door or window open asking it to leave…
    So sorry you had to witness this horrible death of such a beautiful bird the turtle dove. sadly the world has been indoctrinated to KILL throughout the ages and humans justify it for survival..

    As for the grouse shoots etc.. I so dislike that time of year as you say they are bred just to be shot..
    Its horrible..
    Sending thoughts your way

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Dear Sue,
      You have the same attitude and methods as me. I talk to insects too… Trying to guide them out through the window. 😁 It works usually… With a guiding hand. Strange that, isn’t it? 😉

      I support the work of Wild Justice (Mark Avery, Chris Packham, and Ruth Tinghay) as they are taking legal measures against the grouse shooting industry. It affects land management and encourages the persecution of birds of prey.
      Have a great weekend Sue. 🤗❤️

      Liked by 1 person

  7. “They operate in disguise as farmers protecting their crops or livestock from what they consider ‘vermin.’”
    This line is deeply disturbing. Hunters can simply hide behind this and not face any repercussions.

    Is hunting a cultural thing in the UK? Or is it just a sport?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi Saurab,
      Hunting in the UK is controversial. Part of it is a cultural heritage through elitist groups carrying on old Royal pursuits of hunting deer, game birds, etc. But the Royal also used to hunt and kill Elephants and tigers in India for pure sport and the thrill of taking home exotic skins and ivory. I remember once seeing and Elephants foot made into a stand for umbrellas. And back in Victorian times, billiard balls (snooker) were made from elephant ivory. Our remaining ‘sport’ hunting is left over from such days. The fox hunt was outlawed in Britain in 2004, but groups still go out on horseback with hounds, and foxes are invariably still torn to pieces by the ‘pack.’

      There are some reasons that are legal to Cull an animal population, but those reasons are generally stacked in favour of farmers, and many people in the UK see some terribly cruel culls (badgers, rabbits and hares have recently been killed in hundreds of thousands in such culls). Britain’s wildlife population is crashing. It is the worst thing that we can possibly do, to not address the farming issues in balance with nature. It will take the work of activist groups like Green peace, Wild Justice and many other smaller groups, to go up against Government on preserving our wildlife heritage.

      You will have similar problems in India, where farmers do not want wildlife on their land. I know that Elephants can eat their way through a whole crop of squash or pumpkins in just one night.

      We must find better ways so we can all exist together. ❤️

      Like

      1. Hi Collette, I am aware of the tragic colonial past and it’s relationship with wildlife. I did not know they made billiards balls out of ivory though, but i wouldn’t put it past them. The kings in India are also to blame, who supported such activities because they did it themselves. I would encourage you to read about the “exploits” of Hyder Ali, a past ruler of Bengaluru. He used leopards in place of hounds to track and kill tigers.

        It is an eye-opener to hear about the problems of wildlife protection in Britain, especially after the wide acclaim London has received for being the world’s first City National Park. I understand the logic behind farmer’s actions, but it doesn’t justify them. I’m glad to see that NGOs and activist groups are given the freedom to speak against the government in Britain (there is a major clampdown of these forms of activism in India; having worked with Greenpeace India in the past, I’ve heard stories).

        Yes, human wildlife conflicts are a big problem in India as well. It’s not just elephants, but also leopards, rats, and even tigers in the states that have decent populations of them. Some local communities have learnt to coexist, I have heard of villages in the state of Uttarakhand that see leopards as “fellow citizens” and not animals. Here, we have to depend more on such community-driven initiatives rather than activist groups to ensure wildlife protection.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. The community driven group idea sounds great… It is beginning in the UK, but because of our dense urban population, there is a real disconnect for many from nature itself. There are still stories around about children not realising that supermarket bought meat comes from animals.

          Ivory was used for many things until plastic replacements were invented. Piano keys, false teeth, knife and fork handles, musical instruments and religious icons were just a few.
          Even though we see this as abhorrent now, it was just as normal as using wood for furniture pieces during the Victorian era.

          I shall have a look for the exploits of Hyder Ali. I do not know of him. It will be interesting to learn. ❤️

          Liked by 1 person

        1. The big stumbling block is to get religion and its patriarchal bigots and misogynists disenfranchised from interfering with women’s choices on reproductive rights. We should at least move up to 20th C standards, if not 21st C. “What fools these mortals be!” said Puck.

          Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.